C_TFG61 Pass Rate 2026: What the Data Shows

Why There Is No Published C_TFG61 Pass Rate

Searching for the pass rate of the SAP Certified Associate - Administrator - SAP Fieldglass Services Procurement exam (C_TFG61) usually turns up confident-sounding percentages. Treat them with suspicion. SAP does not publish a population pass rate for this assessment, and none has been verified for this article. Any figure quoted by a forum post, a vendor of practice material, or a content farm has no traceable source behind it.

That absence is not unusual for SAP's practical assessments, and it is worth understanding rather than working around. This page explains what data actually exists, how to interpret it, and how to build your own readiness evidence, which is far more useful than a headline percentage. If you want the broader difficulty picture, our guide on how hard the C_TFG61 exam is covers it from the preparation side.

The Data That Does Exist

While there is no pass-rate statistic, the following facts about the current assessment are verified from SAP's own certification pages and help documentation:

Notice what is missing: a question count. "One assessment activity" is not the same as a number of questions, so be wary of anyone promising exact question counts. For a full walkthrough of the format and mechanics, see our passing score breakdown.

Passing Score vs. Pass Rate

These two terms get conflated constantly, and the confusion drives much of the bad information online.

• Passing score (60%): the threshold your individual performance must reach. It is a property of the assessment.
• Pass rate: the share of all candidates who reach that threshold. It is a property of the candidate population, and SAP has not published it for C_TFG61.

A 60% passing score does not mean 60% of candidates pass, and it does not mean the exam is "easy" because the bar sits at 60%. In a scenario-based practical assessment, the score reflects how well you handle realistic Fieldglass situations, so the bar says little about difficulty without knowing how scenarios are scored. Our dedicated article on the C_TFG61 passing score goes deeper on what the threshold does and does not tell you.

How the Practical Format Shapes Outcomes

Because C_TFG61 is an open-book, non-proctored practical assessment, the usual logic of "pass rate versus exam difficulty" breaks down. Traditional multiple-choice exams filter candidates by recall under time pressure. This one filters candidates by whether they can work through Services Procurement scenarios convincingly within a 120-minute window.

AI roleplay versus recorded video

Candidates choose between two delivery modes. The AI-guided roleplay or interview requires microphone access, with camera access optional. The recorded-video option is reviewed by an SAP evaluator and is available in English only. Language availability for the AI mode should be checked in the current exam selector rather than assumed.

One mechanical detail matters for outcomes: pausing the roleplay or taking a break does not stop the overall exam countdown. Candidates who treat the session like an untimed conversation can burn through the 120 minutes without covering the scenario thoroughly.

Where Candidates Likely Lose Points

SAP has not published official topic weights or an exam-objective list for this assessment, so claims about the "most heavily tested" domain are unsupported. What we can do is reason from the structure of the preparation curriculum: 43 units across six SAP courses, spanning both the buyer-side administrator role and the Services Procurement workflow itself. The areas below are where breadth and precision are most likely to be tested, based on the curriculum's own emphasis rather than any published weighting.

For a domain-by-domain walkthrough, see our complete guide to all 43 content areas. One caution: these 43 headings come from preparation courses, and SAP has not confirmed that they exhaustively define exam coverage. Use them as your study map, not as a guarantee of what will appear.

Readiness Signals You Can Measure Yourself

Since population statistics are unavailable, build personal evidence. The following signals are far more predictive of your own result than any aggregate rate would be.

1. Narrate a full SOW end to end. Without notes, talk through creating a Statement of Work, managing its actions and elements, and closing it. If you stall at a stage, that stage is your gap.
2. Distinguish bids from SOWs. Explain what creating an SOW bid involves and how that differs from creating the SOW. This distinction trips up candidates who learned the screens without the logic.
3. Explain template dependencies. Describe which admin objects must exist before an SOW template can function, and which belong to services transactions instead.
4. Record yourself. Because the assessment is spoken or recorded, practice answering aloud for a full 120-minute-style session. Silence and hesitation consume time that the countdown will not give back.
5. Confront your weakest course. Rank the six courses by confidence and give extra time to the bottom two, not the ones you already enjoy.

Structured rehearsal helps here, which is where a quality C_TFG61 practice test adds value: scenario-style questions expose gaps in reasoning that passive reading hides. Pair that with the sequencing advice in our C_TFG61 study guide.

Sequencing the 43 Content Areas

Generic scheduling advice is less useful than ordering that follows the curriculum's own dependencies. Administration concepts feed Services Procurement, and Services Procurement feeds templates, so build in that direction. This is a suggested ordering, not an official plan:

The reasoning is simple: the services workflow (Domains 23-33) is easier to retain once administration concepts like users, suppliers, workflows, and rates are solid, and the analytics and integration material benefits from a prior understanding of what data the system holds. The recommended learning journey also lists Getting Started with Support from SAP and, for intermediate courses, basic Fieldglass knowledge plus Introducing SAP Fieldglass. These are preparation recommendations, not independently verified entry requirements. See C_TFG61 requirements for how to interpret them.

Access, Retakes and Renewal

What you need before you can sit the assessment

Access requires an SAP Universal ID with at least two email accounts on different domains, plus an exam-attempt entitlement from SAP Learning Hub or a separate purchase. Completing all learning courses and practical exercises is recommended but not compulsory. We have not verified a current single-exam fee, because regional checkout pricing varies and was not inspected, so we do not quote one here. Our certification cost guide explains how to confirm current pricing at checkout.

Validity and renewal

The certification is valid for 12 months. You renew annually either through the SAP Learning Hub Stay Certified option or by purchasing and retaking the exam without that subscription. SAP's own documentation is inconsistent on timing: the staying-certified FAQ and the Q2 2026 release notes describe a 90-day window calculated from the original expiry date, while another SAP guide still refers to the assessment pass date. Rather than calculating your own deadline, rely on the due date shown in your My Learning account.

Annual renewal also reframes the pass-rate question. If you expect to maintain the credential, familiarity with the format compounds over time. Our ROI analysis weighs that recurring commitment against the career benefit.

Frequently Asked Questions